How to cite item

Stereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy

  
@article{TLCR23884,
	author = {Michael T. Milano and Feng-Ming (Spring) Kong and Benjamin Movsas},
	title = {Stereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy},
	journal = {Translational Lung Cancer Research},
	volume = {8},
	number = {1},
	year = {2018},
	keywords = {},
	abstract = {Treatment options for thoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging, potentially effective technology to manage recurrent NSCLC, although with limited prospective studies. This work reviews the outcomes of patients undergoing salvage SBRT for pulmonary recurrences after prior resection or prior radiotherapy for NSCLC. Following salvage SBRT, after prior external beam radiation (SBRT or conventionally fractionated), the 2-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 37% to 79% in 11 of the studies (397 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year local control (LC) ranged from 37% to 90% in 6 studies that reported that outcome. Toxicity risks are acceptable albeit with appreciable risks of severe to potentially fatal toxicity, necessitating the need to weigh risks vs. benefits in the re-irradiation setting. There were fewer studies on the use of SBRT after prior resection. Following salvage SBRT, after prior resection, the 2-year OS ranged from 56% to 68% in 4 studies (131 patients) reviewed here, while the 2-year LC ranged from 83% to 100% in 3 of these studies. SBRT in the salvage setting after prior resection appeared to be well-tolerated, with toxicity risks comparable to historical patients treated with SBRT alone (i.e., SBRT without prior resection, which is not reviewed here). The data are limited due to the retrospective nature of published studies (all but 4 with },
	issn = {2226-4477},	url = {https://tlcr.amegroups.org/article/view/23884}
}