Studying the immune landscape in lung cancer models: choosing the right experimental tools
Editorial

Studying the immune landscape in lung cancer models: choosing the right experimental tools

Clare E. Weeden1,2, Casey Ah-Cann1,2, Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat1,2,3

1ACRF Stem Cells and Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 2Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; 3Cancer Early Detection and Advanced Research center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA

Correspondence to: Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat. ACRF Stem Cells and Cancer Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Email: labat@wehi.edu.au.

Comment on: Tippimanchai DD, Nolan K, Poczobutt J, et al. Adenoviral vectors transduce alveolar macrophages in lung cancer models. Oncoimmunology 2018;7:e1438105.


Submitted Aug 24, 2018. Accepted for publication Sep 04, 2018.

doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.09.05


Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of cancer are powerful tools to define the role of specific genetic lesions in tumor formation and progression. In the study of lung cancer, activation of oncogenes or repression of tumor suppressor genes is directly induced in lung epithelial cells—the tumor initiating cells of lung carcinoma (1)—to prevent tumor formation in extra-pulmonary organs. These genetic alterations are mediated through Cre-loxP recombination, whereby expression of Cre recombinase results in the activation of oncogenes or deletion of tumor suppressor genes flanked with LoxP sites. Lung-specific expression of Cre is achieved either by lung delivery (intra-nasal or intra-tracheal instillation, direct intra-pulmonary injection) of recombinant adenoviruses or lentiviruses expressing Cre-recombinase (2,3), or by crossing mice expressing Cre under the control of lung epithelial cell-specific promoters (4). In a recent article published in OncoImmunology, Tippimanchai et al. (5) evaluate the impact of Cre-induced recombination in immune cells after pulmonary administration of adenovirus carrying a ubiquitously expressed Cre-recombinase construct (Ad5-CMV-Cre). Using K-RasLSL-G12D/+; mT/mG mice, they show that Cre-mediated activation of oncogenic K-RasG12D occurs not only in lung epithelial cells, but also in alveolar macrophages, resulting in their proliferation and increased tumor growth in co-xenotransplantation models. This study highlights the importance of the method chosen for induction of Cre-mediated recombination, particularly when investigating novel immunotherapeutic approaches and tumour-immune cell interactions in mouse models of lung cancer.

The clinical utility of immunotherapies to treat cancer has renewed interest into the role of the immune microenvironment in tumor formation and progression. Investigation of the innate and adaptive immune landscape of human cancers has revealed diverse immune microenvironments that can vary according to histological subtype and tumour genomic profile (6). However, these studies in human tumors do not allow for in-depth investigations into causative roles played by the immune infiltrate in cancer initiation, progression and metastasis. Therefore, the use of GEMMs is necessary to untangle the interaction between the immune milieu and tumor cell behavior. GEMMs present a distinct advantage over xenotransplant models that require immunodeficient environments. GEMM tumors grow orthotopically in immunocompetent animals, more accurately mimicking the human disease. However, genetic manipulations in vivo may impact the tumor immune microenvironment. Numerous hematopoietic cells can regulate tumor growth, including T lymphocytes, macrophages and neutrophils. Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is correlated with poor prognosis in solid tumors (7), while presence of activated T-cells is predictor of response to immunotherapy (8). Tippimanchai et al. found that intranasal or intratracheal administration of Ad5-CMV-Cre to activate the K-RasG12D oncogene led not only to the activation of the oncogene in lung epithelial cells, but also in tissue-resident macrophages. While lymphocytes and neutrophils were not significantly affected, K-RasG12D expression was induced in alveolar macrophages resulting in an increase in their proliferation. This study not only reveals the need to acknowledge potential limitations when using GEMMs of lung cancer, but also highlights the role alveolar macrophages may play in promoting lung cancer formation.

Alveolar macrophages are a distinct population of resident macrophages present in the lumen of the airways and alveoli of the lung. They play a critical role in the healthy lung to clear apoptotic cells and cellular debris and facilitate immunological responses in the lung. Alveolar macrophages are distinguished from interstitial macrophages by their high expression of CD11c and SiglecF and the absence of CD11b expression (9). The role of alveolar macrophages in lung cancer has not been studied as extensively as monocyte-derived, tumor-associated macrophages that are recruited to the tumor site to promote cancer growth. Nevertheless, alveolar macrophages appear to facilitate breast cancer metastasis to the lung by suppressing anti-tumor T cell reactivity (10). Depletion of alveolar macrophages reduced tumor burden in EGFR-driven models of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (11) and in urethane-induced models of lung cancer (12), suggesting that alveolar macrophages also promote tumor initiation and progression. A recent analysis using single cell profiling showed accumulation of suppressive PPAR gammahi (Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) macrophages in early stage LUAD lesions, where a higher ratio of tumor-associated macrophages to resident macrophages also correlated with a survival disadvantage (13). These findings prompt further investigations into the role of distinct macrophage populations during lung carcinogenesis and highlight the necessary careful choice of the experimental model for such studies. According to Tippimanchai et al., adenoviral-mediated transduction of lung cells using ubiquitous promoters to activate oncogenes or knock-out tumor suppressor genes has the potential to affect the function of alveolar macrophages (5). It remains to be determined if activation of different oncogenes in alveolar macrophages changes their immunophenotype, their ability to present antigens, or their capacity to secrete specific cytokines; all of which could alter tumor cell proliferation and metastatic potential.

The critical role of the interaction between the immune system and cancer cells is also highlighted by the diversity of the immune landscape in solid tumors. A recent RNA-sequencing analysis of more than 10,000 tumors across 33 sites defined 6 cancer immune profiles (C1–C6). LUAD were found to be associated mostly with the C3 (inflammatory), C2 (IFNγ dominant) and C1 (wound healing) subtypes, whilst lung squamous cell carcinomas (LUSC) were associated predominately with C1 and C2 classes, where the C2 subset had a higher macrophage signature than the C1 subgroup. These findings show that each histological subtype has a different immune landscape. Furthermore, each immune subclass was also found to be associated with distinct oncogenic alterations, where C1 and C2 subtypes were most commonly observed in KRAS, TP53, PIKC3A and PTEN-mutant cancers (6). The variation of the immune milieu with tumor genotype is also observed at the transcriptomic subtype level, where molecular subtypes of LUAD and LUSC showed distinct patterns of immune cell infiltrate (14). This observation was further explored in mouse models, where a higher CD8+ T-cell infiltration was observed in K-Ras and K-Ras/Tp53 mutant lung tumors driven by Ad5-CMV-Cre administration, compared with EGFR-mutant mice, which was further confirmed in a human LUAD tissue microarray (15). The percentage of alveolar macrophages was not evaluated in this study, but tumor-associated macrophages were dramatically increased in all three LUAD models (EGFR, K-Ras, K-Ras/Tp53), compared with small cell lung cancer mouse models driven by loss of Rb1/Tp53 (15). Given the ability of the molecular genotype of tumor cells to dictate the immune landscape, oncogene activation or loss of tumor suppressor genes in alveolar macrophages in GEMMs may exert different effects according to the tumor molecular subtype.

The work by Tippimanchai et al. emphasizes how the use of a ubiquitous promoter driving Cre-recombinase expression, even through localized administration to the lung, may affect multiple cell types and impact tumor growth. Similarly, analysis of tumor progression by loss-of-function of a gene of interest may not only be the result of its inactivation in the epithelial cell compartment, but may also be due to its loss in microenvironmental cells that affect tumor growth. The use of lung specific promoters to drive Cre-recombinase expression circumvents these difficulties. Intranasal or intratracheal administration of lung epithelial cell-specific Ad5-cre viruses (Ad5-SPC-cre, Ad5-CC10-cre, Ad5-CGRP-cre; Ad5-Keratin5-cre) has been successfully used to investigate tumor-initiating cells of lung carcinomas and provides precise models of lung carcinogenesis, where the oncogenic lesion is specifically activated in epithelial cells (16-18). Other genetic tools, such as tamoxifen or doxycycline-inducible knock-in of Cre in lung epithelial cell-specific promoters, have also successfully been used to generate mouse models of LUAD, enabling spatial and temporal activation of oncogenes such as K-RasG12D (4) or EGFR (19) only in epithelial cells. Overall, the new era of cancer immunotherapy has generated immense interest into the interaction between immune and tumor cells, and will require careful consideration of the advantages and limitations of experimental models to explore this cross-talk.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Weeden CE, Chen Y, Ma SB, et al. Lung Basal Stem Cells Rapidly Repair DNA Damage Using the Error-Prone Nonhomologous End-Joining Pathway. PLoS Biol 2017;15. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. DuPage M, Dooley AL, Jacks T. Conditional mouse lung cancer models using adenoviral or lentiviral delivery of Cre recombinase. Nat Protoc 2009;4:1064-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Best SA, Kersbergen A, Asselin-Labat ML, et al. Combining Cell Type-Restricted Adenoviral Targeting with Immunostaining and Flow Cytometry to Identify Cells-of-Origin of Lung Cancer. Methods Mol Biol 2018;1725:15-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Xu X, Rock JR, Lu Y, et al. Evidence for type II cells as cells of origin of K-Ras-induced distal lung adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:4910-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Tippimanchai DD, Nolan K, Poczobutt J, et al. Adenoviral vectors transduce alveolar macrophages in lung cancer models. Oncoimmunology 2018;7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Thorsson V, Gibbs DL, Brown SD, et al. The Immune Landscape of Cancer. Immunity 2018;48:812-30.e14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Best SA, De Souza DP, Kersbergen A, et al. Synergy between the KEAP1/NRF2 and PI3K Pathways Drives Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with an Altered Immune Microenvironment. Cell Metab 2018;27:935-43.e4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Hussell T, Bell TJ. Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:81-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Sharma SK, Chintala NK, Vadrevu SK, et al. Pulmonary alveolar macrophages contribute to the premetastatic niche by suppressing antitumor T cell responses in the lungs. J Immunol 2015;194:5529-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Wang DH, Lee HS, Yoon D, et al. Progression of EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma is Driven By Alveolar Macrophages. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:778-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Zaynagetdinov R, Sherrill TP, Polosukhin VV, et al. A critical role for macrophages in promotion of urethane-induced lung carcinogenesis. J Immunol 2011;187:5703-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Lavin Y, Kobayashi S, Leader A, et al. Innate Immune Landscape in Early Lung Adenocarcinoma by Paired Single-Cell Analyses. Cell 2017;169:750-65.e17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Faruki H, Mayhew GM, Serody JS, et al. Lung Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Gene Expression Subtypes Demonstrate Significant Differences in Tumor Immune Landscape. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12:943-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Busch SE, Hanke ML, Kargl J, et al. Lung Cancer Subtypes Generate Unique Immune Responses. J Immunol 2016;197:4493-503. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Sutherland KD, Song JY, Kwon MC, et al. Multiple cells-of-origin of mutant K-Ras-induced mouse lung adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:4952-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Sutherland KD, Proost N, Brouns I, et al. Cell of origin of small cell lung cancer: inactivation of Trp53 and Rb1 in distinct cell types of adult mouse lung. Cancer Cell 2011;19:754-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Ferone G, Song JY, Sutherland KD, et al. SOX2 Is the Determining Oncogenic Switch in Promoting Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Different Cells of Origin. Cancer Cell 2016;30:519-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Politi K, Zakowski MF, Fan PD, et al. Lung adenocarcinomas induced in mice by mutant EGF receptors found in human lung cancers respond to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor or to down-regulation of the receptors. Genes Dev 2006;20:1496-510. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Weeden CE, Ah-Cann C, Asselin-Labat ML. Studying the immune landscape in lung cancer models: choosing the right experimental tools. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018;7(Suppl 3):S248-S250. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.09.05