Cavity development: a potential biomarker for antiangiogenesis agents
Letter to the Editor

Cavity development: a potential biomarker for antiangiogenesis agents

Man Jiang, Xiaochun Zhang

Department of Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China

Correspondence to: Xiaochun Zhang. Department of Medical Oncology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao 266003, China. Email: zxc9670@qdu.edu.cn.

Provenance and Peer Review: This is an invited article commissioned by the Editorial Office of Translational Lung Cancer Research. Not externally peer reviewed.

Response to:Calvetti L, Aprile G. Influence and mechanism of lung cavitation development on antiangiogenic therapy: is cavitation the new caveat? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8:319-22.
Cecere FL, Aguilar A, Rosell R. Lung cavitation in lung metastases of gastric and non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with apatinib. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8:317-8.
McKay MJ. What’s in a (tumor) cavity? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020;9:8-9.


Submitted Nov 18, 2019. Accepted for publication Dec 09, 2019.

doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.11


Thanks for the editors. Thanks for all the suggestions (1,2). The fish models should be modified to further explain the mechanism. The studies about the influence of cavity development on inflammatory, metastatic and autophagy were going on.

As we all known, lung cavity is the commonest phenomena in patients treated with antiangiogenesis agents (3-6). As our observation, pulmonary lesions generated cavity may be due to “spill-over abscess” and “cavity necrosis” (7).

An important reason to cavity information was “spill-over abscess”. According to baseline data, all patients were in III or IV stage, and all patients with vascular involvement were response for lung cavity generated. As we all known, vascular involvement usually led to gradual bronchial obstruction which will end as tumor necrosis.

Another reason for cavity generated, especially to patients without vascular involvement was cell necrosis. The cell experiments showed that apatinib lead to tumor cells breakdown of the growth, making the proliferation inhibition (6). It has been indicated that antiangiogenesis agents usually lead to generate a lot of apoptotic cells. The antiangiogenic property will cause lacking of support to cell growth, which aggravated the tumor cells necrosis. These mechanisms, both vessel growth inhibition and proliferation inhibition combined inducing the lung cavity information. Furthermore, as the cell experiments showed, under hypoxic conditions, apatinib could not inhibit the protein expression of VEGFR and HIF-α, indicating the cell necrosis will be limited when lung cavity generated.

In our follow-up study, after stop antiangiogenic therapy, subsequent fill-in phenomenon can be observed in many patients who did not receiving any adjuvant radiotherapy. And all patients with radiation pneumonitis did not return to normal. This means the infection in lung will influence the recovery of lung.

In conclusion, lung cavity may mean effective disease control in pulmonary lesions, and it is a reversible process in antiangiopathy. While in apatinib therapy, infection prevention will be paid special attention to ensure patients taking continuous benefits.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by the Taishan Scholar Foundation (grant tshw201502061 to X Zhang), Qingdao People’s LivelihoodScience and Technology Program (grant 16-6-2-3-nsh to X Zhang and 18-2-2-74-jch to M Jiang), Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M6122218 to M Jiang).


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Calvetti L, Aprile G. Influence and mechanism of lung cavitation development on antiangiogenic therapy: is cavitation the new caveat? Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8:319-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Cecere FL, Aguilar A, Rosell R. Lung cavitation in lung metastases of gastric and non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with apatinib. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8:317-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Huang C, Wang X, Wang J, et al. Incidence and clinical implication of tumor cavitation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer induced by Endostar, an angiogenesis inhibitor. Thorac Cancer 2014;5:438-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Marom EM, Martinez CH, Truong MT, et al. Tumor cavitation during therapy with antiangiogenesis agents in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:351-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Nishino M, Cryer SK, Okajima Y, et al. Tumoral cavitation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with antiangiogenic therapy using bevacizumab. Cancer Imaging 2012;12:225-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Crabb SJ, Patsios D, Sauerbrei E, et al. Tumor cavitation: impact on objective response evaluation in trials of angiogenesis inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:404-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Jiang M, Zhang C, Liu D, et al. Influence and mechanism of lung cavitation development on antiangiogenic therapy. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019;8:500-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Jiang M, Zhang X. Cavity development: a potential biomarker for antiangiogenesis agents. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020;9(1):156-157. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.12.11